Scientists comment on topline findings of the NHS Galleri trial, published by GRAIL.
Professor Richard Houlston, Head of the Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, said:
“The press release around the NHS-Galleri trial highlights the familiar misconception that a favourable trend is almost as persuasive as a statistically robust result. GRAIL’s press release emphasises reduced Stage IV and increased Stage I–II diagnoses, yet the trial did not achieve a statistically significant reduction in combined Stage III–IV cancers, its primary endpoint. When the main outcome is not met, selectively highlighting secondary or subgroup findings should be seen as hypothesis-generating, not proof of benefit. Moreover “Stage shift” itself may be an unreliable surrogate for real patient benefit, as increased early-stage detection can reflect overdiagnosis or indolent disease that would never have caused harm. Without mortality data and a transparent account of harms, including false positives, unnecessary procedures, and opportunity cost, claims of population benefit from multi-cancer early detection remain speculative.”
https://grail.com/press-releases/landmark-nhs-galleri-trial-demonstrates-a-substantial-reduction-in-stage-iv-cancer-diagnoses-increased-stage-i-and-ii-detection-of-deadly-cancers-and-four-fold-higher-cancer-detection-rate/
Declared interests
Prof Richard Houlston: “I have no conflicts of interest”