select search filters
roundups & rapid reactions
factsheets & briefing notes
before the headlines
Fiona fox's blog

expert reaction to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Researchers publishing in Occupational and Environmental Medicine report that repeated exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields could increase risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).


Dr Graham Wheeler, Bayesian Medical Statistician at the Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, said:

“By looking at many different exposures and their association with ALS-related deaths, there is a risk that at least one interesting association is found purely by chance.

“Even if there is truly no association between any of the 16 comparisons this study analysed and ALS deaths in men, the chance that at least one of these would incorrectly show a statistical effect is about 55%.

“In other words, we’re more likely than not to find something statistically significant – even if it’s not real.”


Prof. Roel Vermeulen, co-author of the paper:

“ELF-MF are magnetic fields produced by electrical appliances and the power grid, with a frequency up to 300 Hz.

“Jobs with relatively higher ELF-MF levels are for example: electric line installer, repairers and cable jointer, welders, sewing-machine operators, air craft pilots. Essentially jobs where workers are placed in close proximity to appliances that use a lot of electricity.”


Prof. Malcolm Sperrin, Director of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering at the Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, said:

“This paper refers to occupational exposure which implies high current applications such as metal fabrication and other industrial processes.  It is reasonable that such high currents generate large fields, but the paper does not quantify either the magnitude or frequency of such fields or the duration of the exposure.

“Notwithstanding further clarity from the authors this is different from the fields associated with WiFi, domestic power transmission etc. where to date there is no conclusive evidence of an elevated health risk.”


Prof. Neil Pearce, Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, said:

“Several previous studies have found that electrical workers are at increased risk of ALS. We don’t know why the risk is higher, but the two most likely explanations involve either electrical shocks, or ongoing exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields. However, previous studies have not had good information on exposures, and have not been able to separate the effects of electric shocks from those of chronic exposure to magnetic fields.

“This study has much better information on exposure to magnetic fields than previous studies. It shows that the increased risk of ALS in electrical workers is most likely due to magnetic field exposure, rather than to electrical shocks.

“In particular, it is well-known that there are genetic causes of ALS, but the occupational and environmental causes of the disease have not received much attention to date. These new findings indicate that occupational and environmental causes of ALS may be more important than was previously thought.

“Currently we don’t know what the likely mechanisms behind exposure to low frequency magnetic fields are. However if this finding is real, it is important as it identifies a new, preventable cause of ALS. These findings may also help us to understand the disease better including the mechanisms by which it is caused and could help us find other causes of ALS.”


Prof. Christian Holscher, Lancaster University, said:

“This study analyses the potential risk factors for ALS such as chemicals, smoking, exposure to metals or electric shocks.

“They found that of all factors, only extremely low frequency magnetic fields appear to increase the risk of developing ALS.

“One has to take this result with caution, as the patient numbers were very low.

“Even if this study does not show an effect in factors such as exposure to chlorinated solvents, it does not mean that there is no contribution of these factors.

“It may be that the patient numbers are just too low to show a statistically significant effect.

“In addition, the effect of extremely low frequency magnetic fields on ALS development is not clear.

“The trend is only just statistically significant, and with such low numbers, it may well be a false positive.

“Furthermore, it is not clear what extremely low frequency magnetic fields actually are.

“We are surrounded by electro- magnetic fields which are high frequency, e.g. from power lines.

“This paper does not define what those low frequency magnetic fields are.

“Is the 50Hz field of our electric current included? Probably not, as this is not an extremely low frequency.

“It is not clear what conclusion to draw from this study, and further studies with more patients will have to be made before any clear conclusions can be drawn from this.”


Prof. Malcolm Sperrin, Director of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering at the Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, said:

“This is a well-designed study that has been rigorously peer-reviewed and as such carries a lot of credibility.  This is supported by the status of the journal and the authors.

“The statistical methods are good but this type of study can be extremely complex with confounding factors that make unambiguous association very difficult.  The data in this study does not show that exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields, such as from power lines, increases the risk of developing MND.  However, it does suggest a link between field exposure and health which is a useful springboard to further research studies which I welcome.

“There is also a need to understand the limitations that the authors themselves state that relates to the precise impact on health of exposure to the published agents.  This arises because the death certificate is used as the indicator of fatal cause rather than health detriment whilst still living.  This can mean that some health detriments are not recorded.  There is also work still to be conducted on actual occupational exposure factors such as field strength, field frequency, occupancy factors etc.  – they are not covered by this paper but will no doubt feature in future work.

“There is a natural tendency to extend this data and its conclusions to domestic and environmental exposure. This is a useful area to investigate but the absence of frequency and field strength data makes this link impossible to discuss at this stage since this paper relates to occupational exposure where fields are likely to be large.” 


Prof. Paul Pharoah, Professor of Cancer Epidemiology at the University of Cambridge, said:

“The study of health risks associated with exposure to things in the environment like chemicals and different types of radiation is important.  This paper reports the results of a large study in which about 120,000 middle aged men and women were followed up for 17 years.  During this time 76 of the men and 60 of the women died from a form of motor neurone disease called amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

“Questionnaires were used to estimate the occupational exposure to a wide range of chemicals including solvents, pesticides, metals, extremely low frequency magnetic fields in the people who had developed ALS and these were compared to about 4,000 individuals from the study who had not developed ALS.

“A large number of exposures were evaluated.  Of these only occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields was “significantly” associated with risk of ALS in men, but not women.

“However, an association between extremely low frequency magnetic fields and ALS is far from proven by these data.

“Even though the study was very carefully conducted there are two main problems with the results.  The first is that chance is the most likely explanation for the findings.  The researchers evaluated ten different exposures in men and in women.  If none of these exposures were associated with a risk of ALS then by chance an apparent association (statistically significant) would be observed in 1 out of 20 exposures.  Thus, what was found in this study was no more than would be expected by chance.

“If there were a true association between extremely low frequency magnetic fields and ALS it would be very surprising if this was present in men but not women.  Thus, the fact that no association at all was found in women is evidence against a true association at all.

“A second problem is that, even if the association between extremely low frequency magnetic fields and ALS were not due to chance, association does not mean causation.  It is likely that occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields is correlated with many other factors that could be the cause of the observed association.

“Finally it is worth noting that the absolute risk of ALS in this cohort was very low with about 1 case per thousand individuals followed up over 17 years and only 1 in 10 men and 1 in 100 women in this population were exposed to high levels of extremely low frequency magnetic fields.”


* ‘Occupational exposure and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a prospective cohort’ by Tom Koeman et al. published in Occupational & Environmental Medicine on Wednesday 29 March 2017.


Declared interests

None declared.

in this section

filter RoundUps by year

search by tag