Science Media Centre where science meets the headlines
archive

 

07 May 2008

Scientists respond to the Advisory Council on Misuse of Drugs’ report on 'Cannabis: Classification and Public Health'


See also the briefing to launch the report, which was held at the SMC; details here.

The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) was asked by the Home Secretary in July 2007 to provide advice to the Government on the classification of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. The resulting report, 'Cannabis: Classification and Public Health', was published on 7 May.


Professor Colin Blakemore, former Head of the Medical Research Council, said:

"Cannabis use has fallen considerably since it was re-classified in 2004. Restoring it to Class B, against the advice of the government’s own expert committee, is unlikely to protect those who are most vulnerable but will increase their chance of a criminal record. The confusion over cannabis highlights the need for a proper overhaul of the present classification system, which the public neither understands nor respects."

Professor Glyn Lewis, Professor of Psychiatric Epidemiology at the University of Bristol, said:

"Even though we cannot be certain that cannabis causes psychotic illnesses such as schizophrenia, there is now enough evidence to warn people of the possible risks that cannabis poses to mental health."

Professor Robin Murray, Professor of Psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry, said:

"Classification is not the issue – Education is. No 14 year old knows what ‘b’ or ‘c’ means. Indeed many of them don’t regard cannabis as a drug but rather as a natural substance without adverse effects. Whatever the Government does it needs to do it alongside an education campaign that ensures that all young people understand the risks involved, particularly with the more potent varieties such as skunk. Putting the classification back to B may send a signal that reverses some of them damage done by Minsters implying that cannabis is safe. It puts us back to where we were 4 years ago. However, we smoked even more cannabis then than now. The only thing that will bring down consumption is education."

Baroness Susan Greenfield, Director of the Royal Institution, said:

"Surely the whole point of an advisory body is just that, to advise, rather than act as politicians themselves. You wouldn’t expect an expert witness at a trial to issue the verdict, nor to pass sentence.

"It is important to bear in mind that there may be issues related to cannabis use that are not directly linked to mental illness. Issues of concern are lack of motivation and reduced attention span resulting in regular users often not reaching their full potential. My own view is that it is precisely because cannabis is perceived as low risk that people may have a more cavalier attitude to taking the drug on the assumption that their brains are completely inviolate."

To contact the above please contact the Science Media Centre on 020 7670 2980

Note for editors

The Science Media Centre (SMC) is an independent venture working to promote voices, stories and views from the scientific community to the news media when science is in the headlines. Over 50 sponsors including scientific institutions, media groups, corporate organisations and individuals fund the Centre, with donations capped at 5% of the running costs to preserve its independence. The team at the Centre is guided by a respected Scientific Panel and Board of Advisors. This press release contains the personal opinions of those acknowledged; which represent neither the views of the SMC nor any other organisation unless specifically stated.

For more details see our website www.sciencemediacentre.org, please e-mail the Science Media Centre with your comments.

Back

Science Media Centre


top Address